As the tale opens, there is a rumble in a room over Barnaby Sheen's garages, at Sheen's residence in Lafferty's native Oklahoma. But before we get to the source of that rumble, Lafferty dishes out a historical feast of artifacts, and even the smells of previously occupying artifacts, with his characteristic erudition. (And he slips in a line about something 'almost-ape', which will become the subject of the story.)
The sense of deep (even though relatively recent) history Lafferty induces is poignantly nostalgic, quirky, and full of wonder. It puts me in touch with my own boyhood moments spent overwhelmed and delighted in time-cluttered garages, rooms, attics, and the like, and of times with boyhood pals reading comic books and pursuing our hobbies. And it reminds all of us what an endless array of overlapping objects and their 'remnants' accompany our human life. Indeed, I suspect Lafferty would say that so-called 'inanimate' objects are a lot more animate than we think. See, for example, his story 'Symposium' (1973). And this would be in some measure of agreement with OOO theory. To Lafferty, we are not alone - in this object-opulent sense as in others. Life is full, even of 'non-living' things.
Let’s hear a little about this room, then.
In the time of Barnaby Sheen’s
grandfather, who came out here from Pennsylvania at the first rumor of oil and
who bought an anomalous “mansion,” this was not a room over the garages, but
over the stable and carriage house.
It was a hayloft, that’s what it
was; an oatloft, a fodderloft. And a
little corner of it had been a harness room with brads and hammers and knives
and needles as big as sailmakers’ needles, and a cobbler’s bench, and
spokeshaves (for forming and trimming singletrees), and neat’s-foot oil, and
all such. The room, even in its later
decades, had not lost any of its old smells.
There would always be the perfume of timothy hay, of sweet clover, of
little bluestem grass and of prairie grass, of alfalfa, of Sudan grass, of
sorghum cane, of hammered oats and of ground oats, of rock salt, of
apples. Yes, there was an old barrel
there that would remember its apples for a hundred years. Why had it been there? Do not horses love apples for a treat?
There was the smell of shorts and of
bran, the smell of old field tobacco (it must have been cured up there in the
jungle of rafters), the smell of seventy-five-year-old sparks (and the
grindstone that had produced them was there, operable yet), the smell of
buffalo robes (they used them for lap robes in wagons and buggies). There was a forge there and other farrier’s
tools (but they had been brought up from downstairs no more than sixty years
ago, so their smell was not really ancient there).
Then there were a few tokens of the
automobile era, heavily built parts, cabinets, tools, old plugs, old oil
smell. There were backseats of very old
cars to serve as sofas and benches, horns and spotlights and old battery cases,
even very old carbide and kerosene headlights.
But these were in the minority:
there was not so much room for a room over the garages as for a room
over the stables.
There was another and later odor
that was yet very evocative: it could
only be called the smell of almost-ape.
And then there were our own remnants
somewhat before this latter thing.
This had been a sort of club room for us when we were schoolboys and
when we were summer boys. There were trunks
full of old funny papers. They were from
the St. Louis
Post-Dispatch, the St. Louis Globe, The Kansas City Star, the Chicago
Tribune—those were the big-city papers that were hawked in our town, and our
own World and Tribune. There
were a few New York and Boston and Philadelphia funny papers also. And the funnies of the different papers were
not nearly so uniform as they later became.
There were the comparatively more
recent comic books. We had been older
then, almost too old for such things. Yet
there were a few thousand of them, mostly the original property of Cris
Benedetti and John Penandrew.
There was the taxidermy of George
Drakos: stuffed owls, snakes, barn
swallows, water puppies, mountain boomers, flying squirrels, even foxes and
wildcats. And there were the dissections
(also by Drakos) of frogs, of cat brains, of fish, of cow eyes, and many other
specimens. The best of these (those
still maintaining themselves in good state) were preserved in formaldehyde in
Pluto Water bottles. Pluto Water
bottles, with their bevel-fitted glass corks and wire-clamped holders, will
contain formaldehyde forever: this is a fact
too little known. (Is Pluto Water still
in proper history, or has it been relegated out?)
There were the Lepidoptera (the
butterfly and night-moth collections) of Harry O’Donovan, and my own aggregations
of rocks and rock fossils. And there
were all the homemade radios, gamma-ray machines, electrical gadgets generally,
coils, magnet wire, resistors, tubes, of Barnaby Sheen.
8 comments:
Also, you should google image search 'Pluto Water' - it's fun. I'd never heard of it. Cool little piece of history Laff preserved there.
It makes sense: Java is an object-oriented programming language, and with my caffeine addiction, there can be no being without a cup of java. So of course ontology is object-oriented.
And what would you give for a Pluto Water bottle filled with iron tears?
"And Read the Flesh Between the Lines" gives you almost a layered ontology, with more objects than fit the container. Perfect use of this story--makes me appreciate it in a whole new light. Thanks!
'more objects than fit the container' - so true of so much of his fiction! Glad this was useful, Kevin, thanks for the feedback.
I thought of your object-opulent thesis last night while re-reading "Mad Man."
---
It is a legend that humans have an affinity for mechanical things. But normal humans have an innate hatred for machinery, and the accommodation that has grown up between them is a nervous one. The damned stuff just doesn't work right. You hate it, and it hates you. That's the old basic of it.
Swift, a wise old mad man, once wrote a piece on the “Perversity of Inanimate Objects.” And they are perverse, particularly to a sick, ugly, ignorant, incompetent, poor man who fights them in a frenzy — and they fight back.
Ha! As per, Laff is complex about these things. He seems to have a great affinity for objects, including machinery and its component parts. Yet here we have a character in enmity with them. Is Laff sympathetic to this character's view about this, or does the character serve to caution against this attitude? (It's been years since I read 'Mad Man' - need to reread it.)
Relatedly, Laff casts robots/computers as both very bad (e.g. Programmed People in Past Master) and very good (e.g. Epiktistes in Arrive At Easterwine) characters.
I need to read this Swift piece. Lafferty references it (to opposite effect of the quote from 'Mad Man' you've provided) in his doggerel verse that opens his story 'Symposium' (which consists wholly of a philosophical discussion between a child's A.I. alphabet blocks). Years ago, I had read the first stanza over so many times, savouring it, that I had accidentally memorised it and would just walk around absent-mindedly declaiming it. I almost included the whole poem in my essay for Feast of Laughter, but it was already overlong. Here it is:
"Perversity," cried ancient Swift,
"Of lifeless things," and cursed a skewer.
But some of them, with lilt and lift,
Were fuller up with life than you are.
Be there a jug devoid of juice?
A stick or stone with no life in it?
A shoe that has no sense of use?
Then name such. Begin, begin it!
The wisdom of old furniture,
The panniers' passioned cerebration...
"They cannot be!" (But are you sure?)
...The Artifacts' cool speculation...
As reft of life as children's blocks,
The Things arise to balk and bait us.
Be it a chance such ricks and rocks,
Inanimate, could animate us?
I'M INANIMATE, YOU'RE INANIMATE--_Virgo Haedus_
Thank you for sharing this. Opulent Habits
Post a Comment